Tap Bonds logo

Tap Bonds: A Product Teardown

A page-by-page look at a bond research platform, and how I’d make it easier for every kind of investor to use.

Self-initiated product teardownUI/UXContentFunctionalityBusiness Strategy2025

Platform: Web (mobile app was in development at the time)

This teardown looks at the UI/UX, content, functionality and business strategy of Tap Bonds. I focused only on the web version, since the mobile app was under major development at the time. I went through every page on the website, and wherever it helped, added a quick wireframe or flowchart to show how I think it could be improved.

Mission: Empower investors with deep research and analytics for the bond market, making fixed-income investing more accessible and transparent.


01 / who uses tap bonds

Who uses Tap Bonds

Before getting into the changes, here are the kinds of people who are likely to use the website, and what gets in their way.

Portrait of Rakhi Sharma, 22, persona

Rakhi Sharma, 22

Curious Beginner

Occupation: Recent graduate, working in her first job

Experience: None, new to investing

Goals: Wants to learn about investing, particularly bonds, but finds financial terms confusing

Pain points:

  • Overwhelmed by financial jargon
  • Unsure how bonds compare to stocks or mutual funds
  • Struggles to evaluate which bond is safe or profitable
Portrait of Rakesh Mehta, 45, persona

Rakesh Mehta, 45

Seasoned Investor

Occupation: Senior IT Manager

Experience: 15+ years in stocks, mutual funds and real estate; now exploring bonds for stability

Goals: Wants a diversified portfolio with bonds, and efficient tools to research them without reading lengthy reports

Pain points:

  • Finds bond data scattered across multiple sources
  • Needs quick, in-depth filtering on his own criteria (returns, maturity, credit rating, etc.)
Portrait of Tamanna Kapoor, 35, persona

Tamanna Kapoor, 35

Portfolio Manager

Occupation: Portfolio Manager at a financial advisory firm

Experience: 10+ years in wealth management

Goals: Needs in-depth, reliable bond data for clients, and efficient research tools to speed up investment decisions

Pain points:

  • Needs bulk analysis tools for evaluating multiple bonds at once
  • Requires customised reports to present findings to clients

02 / critical issues

Critical issues

Not every finding below carries the same weight. Two things on this list aren’t cosmetic, they’re the kind of bug that costs the business money or trust if left alone. I’m surfacing them here first, instead of letting them sit buried in a nine-page walkthrough.

1

The AI Generated Summary quotes stale financial data

On the Bond Screener, the AI summary pulls EPS, Current Ratio and Debt-to-Equity from March 2023, while the Key Metrics tab on the same page already shows March 2024 figures. A user who trusts the AI feature, which is the entire pitch of adding it, is making a bond decision on numbers a year out of date, with the correction sitting one tab away.

Risk: Trust and decision quality. This isn’t a UI nit, it’s a flagship feature actively contradicting its own product.

Fix: Pipe the AI summary from the same data source as Key Metrics, or disable the AI summary until it can be.

2

The “Talk to an Expert” confirm button is invisible at 100% zoom

This is Tap Bonds’s conversion path into a paid, human-assisted service, and most users never zoom out to 80% to go looking for a button they don’t know is missing.

Risk: Direct revenue leak on a lead-generation flow.

Fix: A CSS layout bug. Should be a same-day fix.

Findings at a glance

The full list, triaged by severity and tied to the business risk and persona each one actually affects, rather than treating every finding as equally important.

FindingSeverityBusiness riskPersonaFix effort
AI summary shows stale (2023) data vs. Key Metrics’ current dataCriticalTrust / decision qualityRakesh, TamannaLow–Med
“Talk to an Expert” CTA invisible at 100% zoomHighRevenue (lead-gen)AllLow
Bond Finder (weekly) vs. Bonds Directory (daily) refresh mismatchHighTrust / decision qualityRakesh, TamannaInvestigate
OTP required at every sign-inHighActivation / retentionRakhiMedium
1 Minute News shows stale stories firstMedium-HighTrust (feature’s premise is freshness)AllLow–Med
No tooltip on Bond Finder column headersMediumActivation (beginners can’t use the tool)RakhiLow
Finance Wiki filters push glossary below the foldMediumActivation / educationRakhiLow
Pros & Cons text breaks mid-sentence across bulletsLow-MediumPerceived credibilityTamannaLow
WhatsApp opt-in pre-ticked by defaultMediumTrust / compliance opticsAllLow
Blog categories missing from main blog pageLow-MediumContent discoveryAllLow
Duplicate ISIN / issuer name in bond detail headerLowCosmetic—Low
Duplicate “Bonds Directory” labelLowCosmetic—Low
Redundant chevrons in Tools dropdownLowCosmetic—Low
Overlapping logos in Bond Finder at certain zoomLowCosmetic—Low

03 / the landscape

The landscape

Some notable companies operating in the Indian fintech space:

Logos of Stable Money, Groww, Moneycontrol, TradingView, Navi, INDmoney, Zerodha and The Economic Times
CompanyInsights on bondsBond investment platform
Stable MoneyYesYes
Navi——
Groww——
INDmoneyYesYes
MoneycontrolYes—
The Economic TimesYes—
TradingView——
Tap InvestYesYes
Tap BondsYes—

04 / page walkthrough

1. Onboarding

Tap Bonds sign-in screen asking for a phone number, with an arrow pointing at the pre-ticked WhatsApp notifications checkbox
The WhatsApp opt-in is ticked by default on every sign-in.

Sign-in is smooth, but having to log in with an OTP every single time gets frustrating. I had to log in three times within two days.

Fix: Introduce Google sign-in so users stay logged in. If phone number stays the norm, add a username and password option to make returning easier.

At every sign-in, the WhatsApp notifications box is ticked by default, which can read as a marketing tactic. It would be friendlier and more transparent to remember the user’s previous choice.


2. Navigation bar

The arrow icons next to Tools and Knowledge Centre make sense, since both open a dropdown on hover. But the arrows beside every tool inside the dropdown aren’t needed. Hovering already changes the box from white to light blue, so the arrows are repetitive and suggest there’s another dropdown when there isn’t.

Tools dropdown in the Tap Bonds navigation, with an arrow pointing at the chevron beside each tool
Right side of the navigation bar showing Search, What's new and Sign in, with the Sign in menu open showing Dashboard and Bond community

What’s New and Search feel out of place. Dashboard is already on the nav bar, and the community link is already in Knowledge Centre.

Dashboard could also live under the profile menu, alongside Wishlist and Logout, as well as on the nav bar.

And since we’re looking at community: why not Telegram or Slack?

Flowchart of the proposed navigation: Logo, Dashboard, Tools, Knowledge Centre and User at the top level, with Tools, Knowledge Centre and User each expanding into their sub-pages
Ideal navigation bar flow

3. Tools → Bond Finder

Bond Finder results table with arrows pointing at the column headers and at an overlapping logo in the Available at column
Overlapping logos in the Available at column: a UI bug that goes away when the page is zoomed out.
Databento's data catalogue showing a hover tooltip that explains each column header
Reference: databento.com explains its headers with a simple hover tooltip.

A lot of Tap Bonds users are new to investing too. It’s good practice to give them a basic idea of what each column header means, and a simple hover tooltip does the job (see databento.com).

An open question from the FAQ: Why is Bond Finder updated weekly when Bonds Directory updates daily at 2 AM? Doesn’t a weekly refresh affect investor choices, or is daily updating planned for later?

My hypothesis: Bond Finder likely pulls from a third-party data vendor, priced or rate-limited per refresh, while Bonds Directory may run on an internally-maintained feed that’s cheaper to update. If that’s right, the fix isn’t necessarily “make Bond Finder daily too,” vendor economics may not allow it. The actual fix is to visibly timestamp Bond Finder’s “last updated” so an investor comparing it against Bonds Directory’s same-day data knows which one they’re looking at. The real risk here isn’t the refresh cadence, it’s two tools in the same product silently disagreeing with each other.

After clicking on an instrument

Bond detail page header where the ISIN appears in both the breadcrumb and the title row, with arrows marking the repetition
Current: the issuer name and ISIN are repeated in the breadcrumb and the title row.

The issuer name and ISIN appear twice in a row. Here’s a cleaner version:

Proposed bond detail page with the title row removed and the Active tag and share icon moved up into the breadcrumb
Proposed: one row instead of two.

No data is lost. The ISIN in the breadcrumb can carry the link that used to sit on the removed header.


4. Tools → Bond Screener

Navi Finserv Limited page in Bond Screener, with arrows pointing at Pros and Cons text broken across lines and at the AI Generated Summary button

The Pros & Cons content isn’t parsed into bullets correctly, so sentences break across separate points.

Clicking AI Generated Summary opens this:

AI generated summary text listing EPS, Current Ratio, Debt to Equity, Total Revenue and Net Income from March 2023
The AI summary quotes March 2023 figures.

Compare EPS and Current Ratio in the AI summary with the Key Metrics tab: the AI data is out of date.

So what’s the point of the AI summary, when everything in it is already on the page, in a much better format?

Key Metrics tab on the same page showing March 2024 figures for EPS, Current Ratio, Debt to Equity and more
The Key Metrics tab on the same page already shows March 2024.

5. Tools → Bonds Directory

Bonds Directory page with arrows pointing at the small Bonds Directory eyebrow label and the large Bonds Directory heading

“Bonds Directory” is written twice, once as a small label and once as the heading. The upper label can go.


6. Tools → Talk to an Expert

At 100% zoom, the button to book a consultation isn’t visible. I had to zoom out to 80% to find it.

Talk to an expert booking modal at 100% zoom, with the confirm button cut off below the visible area
At 100% zoom.

7. Knowledge Centre → Finance Wiki

At 100% zoom, the glossary is hard to read because the filters take up most of the space.

Fix: Let individual cards pop out when clicked.

Finance Wiki page at 100% zoom where category filters and the alphabet bar push the glossary cards below the fold
Current Finance Wiki at 100% zoom.
Mockup of the Finance Wiki with an Accrued Interest card expanded into a pop-out showing its definition and an Investopedia link
Proposed: a single term opens as a pop-out card.

8. Knowledge Centre → Blogs

Blog post page with the Categories list in the sidebar circled

The categories only show up on individual blog posts. They should also be on the main blog page, so readers can pick the topics they care about.

This is just one example of how the filters could look. For design consistency, they could also follow the keyword chips already used on the Finance Wiki:

Mockup of the blogs page with Finance, Bonds, Asset Leasing and Invoice Discounting filters added under the header
One way to show category filters.
Finance Wiki filter chips: All, Financial Terms, Financial Instruments, Mutual Funds, Derivatives, Trading Terms
Finance Wiki filter chips

9. Knowledge Centre → 1 Minute News

The latest pieces don’t show up first. 18 February was the newest piece on the news page, but it wasn’t reflected on the homepage or in Knowledge Centre → 1 Minute News.

Get latest news in 1min section showing four news cards, the newest dated 28 January 2025
Current 1 Minute News section in Knowledge Centre with paginated cards
Knowledge Centre → 1 Minute News
Proposed version with a single Check it out button, circled, in the top right
Knowledge Centre → 1 Minute News (updated)

Instead of pagination, a single button can link to the full 1 Minute News page, with the latest story always on the first card. Ideally this page isn’t needed at all, and users can go straight to 1minutenews.substack.com.


05 / business strategy

Business strategy

If Tap Bonds eventually lets people invest on the platform, its competition is:

Stable MoneyGrowwNaviINDmoneyZerodha

If Tap Bonds stays a research-first platform, its competition is:

MoneycontrolTradingViewStable MoneyGrowwZerodhaThe Economic Times

Assumption: Tap Bonds wants to stay a research-oriented platform rather than become an investing platform.

That means it can focus on:

  • Deeper analytical focus: a data-driven approach without pushing transactions.
  • Trust and independence: users may trust the insights more because the platform isn’t tied to investment commissions.
  • Flexible monetisation: reports, subscriptions or partnerships instead of transaction fees, priced for the Indian market.

Risks

  • Competition: established players already cover equity and mutual funds as well as bonds.
  • International coverage: Tap Bonds only covers the Indian market, while several of these companies have already expanded internationally.
  • Mobile app: it’s always easier to browse markets on a phone, and Tap Bonds doesn’t have an app yet.

06 / recommendations

Where I’d focus

Rather than an unranked list of ideas, this is a roadmap: severity and effort decide what ships first, and what gets batched into cleanup.

Fix now

High severity, low effort

  • AI summary data mismatch
  • “Talk to an Expert” button visibility
  • Timestamp Bond Finder’s refresh cadence

Next quarter

High severity, more effort

  • Google sign-in to kill repeat OTP friction
  • Column-header tooltips and Finance Wiki fold fix (both unblock the beginner persona)
  • Fix 1 Minute News freshness ordering

Batch into one UI cleanup sprint

Low severity, low effort each

  • Duplicate labels, redundant chevrons, overlapping logos
  • Pre-ticked WhatsApp checkbox
  • Blog categories on the main blog page

Strategic

On top of the fixes above, the research-platform-vs-investing-platform fork, monetisation directions and competitive risk covered in Business strategy are the longer-horizon bets, worth revisiting once the roadmap above is clear.


Read the full teardown (PDF)